I believe the decision to invite Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration was a carefully calculated overstep rather than a misstep that actually demonstrates promise for lesbian and gay concerns around what the Obama administration will mean for LGBT rights (Please excuse my lumping of these movements into the normalized acronym–I know they are integrated, yet distinct).
This is my rationale: Obama considers himself so comfortable as an advocate for Gay Rights that he thought he could choose Warren in a genuine and obvious effort to heal divides without appearing to advocate for Warren’s position. All of his explanatory references indicate this was the case. Yet in the face of Proposition 8 and the wounds its passage opened in progressive communities across the nation, his action was understandaby interpreted with cynicism and shocked disapproval. Why does this action hold promise for this same group of alienated Obamites? Because it shows his commitment runs deep enough that he assumed it would translate. He was wrong, but the intention–to heal a divide by a demonstrative act of conciliation may very well create the bridge that can mend the incisions of discrimination Proposition 8–and the beliefs of folks like Warren–have created. If we can “disagree without being disagreeable”, then this act of respect for a view that is anethema to what Obama represents could very well be the best strategy for ensuring Gay Rights.
I know, I feel a little bit like a mother who knows her kid did something wrong trying to find any way to excuse his behavior. I think he could have done this differently and I totally understand why so many Gay Rights activists are up in arms (not to mention the problematics of his position on abortion). I have waited to comment on this for some time, because I really was perplexed and could not figure out why Obama did make the choice he did. I do not mean to excuse him. I think his timing was perplexing and his explanation not quick or articulate enough. And btw–I really resent his (Obama’s)position on Gay Marriage and find it ridiculously politically motivated, problematic, and unacceptable. The religious arguments for the “sanctity of marriage between a man and a woman” are so absurd and the use of the bible as proof is laughable, since that document does not seem to hold marriage in very high regard. Yet maybe, just maybe, Obama does feel this way too and couldn’t say it during the campaign. Maybe, just maybe this move is a first step to beginning a dialogue that will result in the inclusion of gay couples in the cultural practice of marriage. Maybe, just maybe this is a signal that this issue will be one Obama is prioritizing and intending to heal. And maybe, just maybe Warren will say something about this issue that surprises us all. We will have to wait and see and I think we will know more after watching the whole inaugural show rather than prejudging it based on one isolated part. There could be a silver lining on the Warren cloud yet.